Most websites age quietly.
A launch feels finished for a week. Then the product changes, a page goes stale, a link breaks, the Open Graph image is wrong, and nobody is quite sure which tool owns the fix.
Small teams feel this hardest. The founder, agency, or operator can usually make the change, but the work is scattered across code, CMS entries, files, domains, previews, analytics, and a publish button everyone is careful around.
Waastly is our answer to that problem: keep the website as real source code, keep content in the platform, and make every live change pass through a reviewable, rollback-friendly path.
The first workflow is deliberately local-first.
Pull the managed site with the Waastly CLI. Edit the WaastWeb project on disk with the coding agent you already use. Build it locally. Push it back to Waastly. Review the changed files, candidate build, and preview. Publish only after approval.
That may sound narrower than a grand marketing platform. It is. It is also the part that has to be trustworthy before anything more autonomous deserves to exist.
Site Health is the next layer: a practical watch list for the details that make a site feel maintained. Broken links. Missing metadata. Stale pages. Heavy assets. Findings that can become reviewed fixes instead of another forgotten checklist.
We are starting with technical founders, agencies, fractional operators, and small B2B teams who already understand that the website is a living system. The goal is not to hide the work. The goal is to make the work visible, reviewable, and safe to ship.
That's what we're building with waastly: an AI site operator for small teams that keeps the website improving after launch.
We are early. If this is the kind of website workflow you want to use, I would like to hear from you.